English

Optimizing galaxy samples for clustering measurements in photometric surveys

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2020-01-07 v2

Abstract

When analyzing galaxy clustering in multi-band imaging surveys, there is a trade-off between selecting the largest galaxy samples (to minimize the shot noise) and selecting samples with the best photometric redshift (photo-z) precision, which generally include only a small subset of galaxies. In this paper, we systematically explore this trade-off. Our analysis is targeted towards the third year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES), but our methods hold generally for other data sets. Using a simple Gaussian model for the redshift uncertainties, we carry out a Fisher matrix forecast for cosmological constraints from angular clustering in the redshift range z=0.20.95z = 0.2-0.95. We quantify the cosmological constraints using a Figure of Merit (FoM) that measures the combined constraints on Ωm\Omega_m and σ8\sigma_8 in the context of Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology. We find that the trade-off between sample size and photo-z precision is sensitive to 1) whether cross-correlations between redshift bins are included or not, and 2) the ratio of the redshift bin width δz\delta z and the photo-z precision σz\sigma_z. When cross-correlations are included and the redshift bin width is allowed to vary, the highest FoM is achieved when δzσz\delta z \sim \sigma_z. We find that for the typical case of 5105-10 redshift bins, optimal results are reached when we use larger, less precise photo-z samples, provided that we include cross-correlations. For samples with higher σz\sigma_{z}, the overlap between redshift bins is larger, leading to higher cross-correlation amplitudes. This leads to the self-calibration of the photo-z parameters and therefore tighter cosmological constraints. These results can be used to help guide galaxy sample selection for clustering analysis in ongoing and future photometric surveys.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1908.07150,
  title  = {Optimizing galaxy samples for clustering measurements in photometric surveys},
  author = {Dimitrios Tanoglidis and Chihway Chang and Joshua Frieman},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07150},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

19 pages, 12 figures, to be submitted to MNRAS

R2 v1 2026-06-23T10:51:44.073Z