English

On the equivalence of binary cubic forms

Number Theory 2025-12-03 v3

Abstract

We consider the question of determining whether two binary cubic forms over an arbitrary field KK whose characteristic is not 22 or 33 are equivalent under the actions of either GL(2,K)(2,K) or SL(2,K)(2,K), deriving two necessary and sufficient criteria for such equivalence in each case. One of these involves an algebraic invariant of binary cubic forms which we call the Cardano invariant, which is closely connected to classical formulas and also appears in the work of Bhargava et al. The second criterion is expressed in terms of the base field itself, and also gives explicit matrices in SL(2,K)(2,K) or GL(2,K)(2,K) transforming one cubic into the other, if any exist, in terms of the coefficients of bilinear factors of a bicovariant of the two cubics. We also consider automorphisms of a single binary cubic form, show how to use our results to test equivalence of binary cubic forms over an integral domain such as~Z\mathbb{Z}, and briefly recall some connections between binary cubic forms and the arithmetic of elliptic curves. The methods used are elementary, and similar to those used in our earlier work with Fisher concerning equivalences between binary quartic forms.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2212.02120,
  title  = {On the equivalence of binary cubic forms},
  author = {J E Cremona},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.02120},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

14 pages. Mostly minor revisions from v2, with added application to explicit construction of cubic extensions of number fields

R2 v1 2026-06-28T07:22:01.446Z