English

On spectra of representations and graphs. Erratum

Spectral Theory 2020-12-29 v1 Representation Theory

Abstract

Unfortunately the proof of the main result of [1], Theorem 1, has a flaw. Namely, Lemma 13 used in the proof of Proposition 11 is correct only under an additional assumption that the operator AA is normal (adjoint for the one-sided shift operator in l2(N)l^2(\mathbb N) provides a counterexample). Below we prove a version of Lemma 13 that does not require the normality assumption and apply it to prove Proposition 11. In addition, the same version of the lemma appears in paper [2] (as Lemma 3.1) where it is used in the proof of Theorem 1.6. We also explain here how to use the new version of Lemma 13 to correct the proof of Theorem 1.6 from [2].

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2012.13565,
  title  = {On spectra of representations and graphs. Erratum},
  author = {Artem Dudko and Rostislav Grigorchuk},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.13565},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

6 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-23T21:24:54.447Z