English

On completeness in a non-Archimedean setting via firm reflections

General Topology 2007-05-23 v1 Category Theory

Abstract

We develop a completion theory for (general) non-Archimedean spaces based on the theory on "a categorical concept of completion of objects" as introduced by G.C.L. Br\"ummer and E. Giuli. Our context is the construct NA0\mathbf{NA}_0 of all Hausdorff non-Archimedean spaces and uniformly continuous maps and V\mathcal{V} is the class of all epimorphic embeddings in NA0\mathbf{NA}_0. We determine the class InjV{\bf Inj} \mathcal{V} of all V\mathcal{V}-injective objects and we present an internal characterization as "complete objects". The basic tool for this characterization is a notion of small collections that in some sense preserve the inclusion order on the non-Archimedean structure. We prove that the full subconstruct CNA0\mathbf{CNA}_0 consisting of all complete objects forms a firmly V\mathcal{V}-reflective subcategory. This means that every object XX in NA0\mathbf{NA}_0 has a completion which is a V\mathcal{V}-reflection rX:XRXr_X:X\to RX into the full subconstruct CNA0\mathbf{CNA}_0 of "complete spaces". Moreover this completion is unique (up to isomorphism) in the sense that, considering L(CNA0)L(\mathbf{CNA}_0), the class of all those morphisms u:XYu: X\to Y for which Ru:RXRYRu:RX\to RY is an isomorphism, one has that V\mathcal{V} is contained in L(CNA0)L(\mathbf{CNA}_0). In fact one even has V=L(CNA0)\mathcal{V}=L(\mathbf{CNA}_0). Finally we apply our constructions to the classical case of Hausdorff non-Archimedean uniform spaces, in that case our completion reduces to the standard one.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0402275,
  title  = {On completeness in a non-Archimedean setting via firm reflections},
  author = {D. Deses and E. Lowen-Colebunders},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0402275},
  year   = {2007}
}

Comments

Special volume: p-adic numbers in number theory, analytic geometry and funtional analysis

R2 v1 2026-07-22T17:02:39.050Z