Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation
Artificial Intelligence
2020-11-05 v1 Logic in Computer Science
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss necessary and sufficient explanations for formal argumentation - the question whether and why a certain argument can be accepted (or not) under various extension-based semantics. Given a framework with which explanations for argumentation-based conclusions can be derived, we study necessity and sufficiency: what (sets of) arguments are necessary or sufficient for the (non-)acceptance of an argument?
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2011.02414,
title = {Necessary and Sufficient Explanations in Abstract Argumentation},
author = {AnneMarie Borg and Floris Bex},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.02414},
year = {2020}
}