Is the problem of Cuprate high-$T_c$ superconductivity a solved problem?

The recent experimental verification of the charge-transfer superexchange mechanism as the microscopic pairing mechanism of high-$T_c$ cuprate superconductivity by Seamus Davis and collaborators\cite{sea} is a tour de force! The correct model for cuprates is the three band Emery model in which oxygen p-orbitals are explicitly taken into account. The doped holes go into these oxygen p-orbitals where they undergo charge-transfer superexchange with unpaired electrons in copper d orbitals. This charge transfer superexchange is the key which leads to bound pairs and superconductivity. In the experimental verification\cite{sea}, the system chosen is $Bi_2Sr_2CaCu_2O_{8+x}$. What is achieved is the direct functional dependence of the local electron pair density ($n_P(r)$) on local charge transfer energy ($\ep_{pd}(r)$) using state of the art single-electron and electron-pair (Josephson) scanning tunneling microscopy. The quantitative functional dependence of $n_P(r)$ on $\ep_{pd}(r)$ matches with that indicated and deduced by theory\cite{t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9,t10}. The verdict of the experiment settles the debates on the microscopic mechanisms of the cuprate superconductivity in the clear favor of charge-transfer superexchange mechanism. We discuss this development in brief, and present a simple minded approach to the essence of cuprate superconductivity. We discuss what is settled now, and what is not settled yet. A "theoretical minimum" of the high-$T_c$ problem is also discussed.