English

Improving Photometric Redshift Estimates with Training Sample Augmentation

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2024-05-15 v2 Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract

Large imaging surveys will rely on photometric redshifts (photo-z's), which are typically estimated through machine learning methods. Currently planned spectroscopic surveys will not be deep enough to produce a representative training sample for LSST, so we seek methods to improve the photo-z estimates that arise from non-representative training samples. Spectroscopic training samples for photo-z's are biased towards redder, brighter galaxies, which also tend to be at lower redshift than the typical galaxy observed by LSST, leading to poor photo-z estimates with outlier fractions nearly 4 times larger than for a representative training sample. In this paper, we apply the concept of training sample augmentation, where we augment simulated non-representative training samples with simulated galaxies possessing otherwise unrepresented features. When we select simulated galaxies with (g-z) color, i-band magnitude and redshift outside the range of the original training sample, we are able to reduce the outlier fraction of the photo-z estimates for simulated LSST data by nearly 50% and the normalized median absolute deviation (NMAD) by 56%. When compared to a fully representative training sample, augmentation can recover nearly 70% of the degradation in the outlier fraction and 80% of the degradation in NMAD. Training sample augmentation is a simple and effective way to improve training samples for photo-z's without requiring additional spectroscopic samples.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2402.15551,
  title  = {Improving Photometric Redshift Estimates with Training Sample Augmentation},
  author = {Irene Moskowitz and Eric Gawiser and John Franklin Crenshaw and Brett H. Andrews and Alex I. Malz and Samuel Schmidt and The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15551},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

11 pages, 4 figures, published in ApJ Letters

R2 v1 2026-06-28T14:58:40.593Z