English

Improved Inapproximability Results for Steiner Tree via Long Code Based Reductions

Computational Complexity 2017-02-21 v4

Abstract

The best algorithm for approximating Steiner tree has performance ratio ln(4)+ϵ1.386\ln(4)+\epsilon \approx 1.386 [J. Byrka et al., \textit{Proceedings of the 42th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)}, 2010, pp. 583-592], whereas the inapproximability result stays at the factor 96951.0105\frac{96}{95} \approx 1.0105 [M. Chleb\'ik and J. Chleb\'ikov\'a, \textit{Proceedings of the 8th Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory (SWAT)}, 2002, pp. 170-179]. In this article, we take a step forward to bridge this gap and show that there is no polynomial time algorithm approximating Steiner tree with constant ratio better than 19181.0555\frac{19}{18} \approx 1.0555 unless \textsf{P = NP}. We also relate the problem to the Unique Games Conjecture by showing that it is \textsf{UG}-hard to find a constant approximation ratio better than 1716=1.0625\frac{17}{16} = 1.0625. In the special case of quasi-bipartite graphs, we prove an inapproximability factor of 25241.0416\frac{25}{24} \approx 1.0416 unless \textsf{P = NP}, which improves upon the previous bound of 1281271.0078\frac{128}{127} \approx 1.0078. The reductions that we present for all the cases are of the same spirit with appropriate modifications. Our main technical contribution is an adaptation of a Set-Cover type reduction in which the Long Code is used to the geometric setting of the problems we consider.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1702.02882,
  title  = {Improved Inapproximability Results for Steiner Tree via Long Code Based Reductions},
  author = {Ali Çivril},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.02882},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

Retracted due to an error in the construction

R2 v1 2026-06-22T18:14:02.105Z