English

How is a graph not like a manifold?

Algebraic Topology 2026-02-10 v2 K-Theory and Homology

Abstract

For an equivariantly formal action of a compact torus TT on a smooth manifold XX with isolated fixed points we investigate the global homological properties of the graded poset S(X)S(X) of face submanifolds. We prove that the condition of jj-independency of tangent weights at each fixed point implies (j+1)(j+1)-acyclicity of the skeleta S(X)rS(X)_r for r>j+1r>j+1. This result provides a necessary topological condition for a GKM graph to be a GKM graph of some GKM manifold. We use particular acyclicity arguments to describe the equivariant cohomology algebra of an equivariantly formal manifold of dimension 2n2n with an (n1)(n-1)-independent action of (n1)(n-1)-dimensional torus, under certain colorability assumptions on its GKM graph. This description relates the equivariant cohomology algebra to the face algebra of a simplicial poset. Such observation underlines certain similarity between actions of complexity one and torus manifolds.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2203.10641,
  title  = {How is a graph not like a manifold?},
  author = {Anton Ayzenberg and Mikiya Masuda and Grigory Solomadin},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10641},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

23 pages, 3 figures. In v2 we changed the second part of the paper (on the relation between complexity 1 and 0). To clarify the arguments we sacrificed generality: now in Theorem 2 we require GKM graph to bipartite

R2 v1 2026-06-24T10:19:47.252Z