How does limma-trend work? An empirical partially Bayes perspective
Abstract
In high-throughput biology, it is common to fit thousands of linear regressions -- one per gene, protein, or other unit -- with very few samples per unit. Limma-trend, one of the most widely used methods in this setting, improves power by shrinking variance estimates parametrically toward a fitted curve (the trend) relating variance to a unit-level summary (e.g., average intensity, peptide count), before computing p-values and applying the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). We study limma-trend through the lens of empirical partially Bayes inference, a paradigm in which a prior is posited and estimated for the nuisance parameters while parameters of interest remain fixed. From this perspective, limma-trend computes approximate partially Bayes p-values that condition on the residual sample variance and the unit-level summary. The same framework explains why MAnorm2, a popular variant for ChIP-seq, can sometimes fail to control FDR. We then derive a nonparametric generalization of limma-trend that estimates the residual variance prior using nonparametric maximum likelihood. Under dense signals, this procedure asymptotically controls the FDR -- even when the trend is misspecified or inconsistently estimated. To allow the full shape of the conditional variance distribution to depend on the unit-level summary, we develop a second procedure that learns it directly.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2605.21304,
title = {How does limma-trend work? An empirical partially Bayes perspective},
author = {Sagnik Nandy and Wanyi Ling and Nikolaos Ignatiadis},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.21304},
year = {2026}
}