Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable proficiency in explicit visual recognition, effectively describing what is directly visible in an image. However, a critical cognitive gap emerges when the visual input serves only as a clue rather than the answer. We identify that current models struggle with the complex, multi-step reasoning required to solve problems where information is not explicitly depicted. Successfully solving a rebus puzzle requires a distinct cognitive workflow: the model must extract visual and textual attributes, retrieve linguistic prior knowledge (such as idioms), and perform abstract mapping to synthesize these elements into a meaning that exists outside the pixel space. To evaluate this neurosymbolic capability, we introduce RebusBench, a benchmark of 1,164 puzzles designed to test this specific integration of perception and knowledge. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art models (including Qwen, InternVL, and LLaVA) shows a severe deficiency: performance saturates below 10% Exact Match and 20% semantic accuracy, with no significant improvement observed from model scaling or In-Context Learning (ICL). These findings suggest that while models possess the necessary visual and linguistic components, they lack the cognitive reasoning glue to connect them. Project page available at https://amirkasaei.com/rebusbench/.
@article{arxiv.2604.01764,
title = {Hidden Meanings in Plain Sight: RebusBench for Evaluating Cognitive Visual Reasoning},
author = {Seyed Amir Kasaei and Arash Marioriyad and Mahbod Khaleti and MohammadAmin Fazli and Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah and Mohammad Hossein Rohban},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01764},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Accepted at ICLR 2026 Workshop: From Human Cognition to AI Reasoning (HCAIR)