English

Guidelines for developing optical clocks with $10^{-18}$ fractional frequency uncertainty

Atomic Physics 2019-08-14 v2

Abstract

There has been tremendous progress in the performance of optical frequency standards since the first proposals to carry out precision spectroscopy on trapped, single ions in the 1970s. The estimated fractional frequency uncertainty of today's leading optical standards is currently in the 101810^{-18} range, approximately two orders of magnitude better than that of the best caesium primary frequency standards. This exceptional accuracy and stability is resulting in a growing number of research groups developing optical clocks. While good review papers covering the topic already exist, more practical guidelines are needed as a complement. The purpose of this document is therefore to provide technical guidance for researchers starting in the field of optical clocks. The target audience includes national metrology institutes (NMIs) wanting to set up optical clocks (or subsystems thereof) and PhD students and postdocs entering the field. Another potential audience is academic groups with experience in atomic physics and atom or ion trapping, but with less experience of time and frequency metrology and optical clock requirements. These guidelines have arisen from the scope of the EMPIR project "Optical clocks with 1×10181 \times 10^{-18} uncertainty" (OC18). Therefore, the examples are from European laboratories even though similar work is carried out all over the world. The goal of OC18 was to push the development of optical clocks by improving each of the necessary subsystems: ultrastable lasers, neutral-atom and single-ion traps, and interrogation techniques. This document shares the knowledge acquired by the OC18 project consortium and gives practical guidance on each of these aspects.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1906.11495,
  title  = {Guidelines for developing optical clocks with $10^{-18}$ fractional frequency uncertainty},
  author = {Moustafa Abdel-Hafiz and Piotr Ablewski and Ali Al-Masoudi and Héctor Álvarez Martínez and Petr Balling and Geoffrey Barwood and Erik Benkler and Marcin Bober and Mateusz Borkowski and William Bowden and Roman Ciuryło and Hubert Cybulski and Alexandre Didier and Miroslav Doležal and Sören Dörscher and Stephan Falke and Rachel M. Godun and Ramiz Hamid and Ian R. Hill and Richard Hobson and Nils Huntemann and Yann Le Coq and Rodolphe Le Targat and Thomas Legero and Thomas Lindvall and Christian Lisdat and Jérôme Lodewyck and Helen S. Margolis and Tanja E. Mehlstäubler and Ekkehard Peik and Lennart Pelzer and Marco Pizzocaro and Benjamin Rauf and Antoine Rolland and Nils Scharnhorst and Marco Schioppo and Piet O. Schmidt and Roman Schwarz and Çağrı Şenel and Nicolas Spethmann and Uwe Sterr and Christian Tamm and Jan W. Thomsen and Alvise Vianello and Michał Zawada},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.11495},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

130 pages, Table 5.3 corrected in v2

R2 v1 2026-06-23T10:05:05.596Z