English

Gradient Descent's Last Iterate is Often (slightly) Suboptimal

Optimization and Control 2026-04-16 v1 Machine Learning

Abstract

We consider the well-studied setting of minimizing a convex Lipschitz function using either gradient descent (GD) or its stochastic variant (SGD), and examine the last iterate convergence. By now, it is known that standard stepsize choices lead to a last iterate convergence rate of logT/T\log T/\sqrt{T} after TT steps. A breakthrough result of Jain et al. [2019] recovered the optimal 1/T1/\sqrt{T} rate by constructing a non-standard stepsize sequence. However, this sequence requires choosing TT in advance, as opposed to common stepsize schedules which apply for any time horizon. Moreover, Jain et al. conjectured that without prior knowledge of TT, no stepsize sequence can ensure the optimal error for SGD's last iterate, a claim which so far remained unproven. We prove this conjecture, and in fact show that even in the noiseless case of GD, it is impossible to avoid an excess poly-log factor in TT when considering an anytime last iterate guarantee. Our proof further suggests that such (slightly) suboptimal stopping times are unavoidably common.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.13870,
  title  = {Gradient Descent's Last Iterate is Often (slightly) Suboptimal},
  author = {Guy Kornowski and Ohad Shamir},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.13870},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T12:10:45.574Z