FuzzingRL: Reinforcement Fuzz-Testing for Revealing VLM Failures
Abstract
Vision Language Models (VLMs) are prone to errors, and identifying where these errors occur is critical for ensuring the reliability and safety of AI systems. In this paper, we propose an approach that automatically generates questions designed to deliberately induce incorrect responses from VLMs, thereby revealing their vulnerabilities. The core of this approach lies in fuzz testing and reinforcement finetuning: we transform a single input query into a large set of diverse variants through vision and language fuzzing. Based on the fuzzing outcomes, the question generator is further instructed by adversarial reinforcement fine-tuning to produce increasingly challenging queries that trigger model failures. With this approach, we can consistently drive down a target VLM's answer accuracy -- for example, the accuracy of Qwen2.5-VL-32B on our generated questions drops from 86.58\% to 65.53\% in four RL iterations. Moreover, a fuzzing policy trained against a single target VLM transfers to multiple other VLMs, producing challenging queries that degrade their performance as well.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2603.06600,
title = {FuzzingRL: Reinforcement Fuzz-Testing for Revealing VLM Failures},
author = {Jiajun Xu and Jiageng Mao and Ang Qi and Weiduo Yuan and Alexander Romanus and Helen Xia and Vitor Campagnolo Guizilini and Yue Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.06600},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
18 pages, 4 figures. {\dag} These authors jointly supervised this work: Jiageng Mao and Yue Wang