English

From Sticky-Hard-Sphere to Lennard-Jones-Type Clusters

Atomic and Molecular Clusters 2018-05-02 v2

Abstract

A relation MSHSLJ\mathcal{M}_{\mathrm{SHS}\to\mathrm{LJ}} between the set of non-isomorphic sticky hard sphere clusters MSHS\mathcal{M}_\mathrm{SHS} and the sets of local energy minima MLJ\mathcal{M}_{LJ} of the (m,n)(m,n)-Lennard-Jones potential VmnLJ(r)=εnm[mrnnrm]V^\mathrm{LJ}_{mn}(r) = \frac{\varepsilon}{n-m} [ m r^{-n} - n r^{-m} ] is established. The number of nonisomorphic stable clusters depends strongly and nontrivially on both mm and nn, and increases exponentially with increasing cluster size NN for N10N \gtrsim 10. While the map from MSHSMSHSLJ\mathcal{M}_\mathrm{SHS}\to \mathcal{M}_{\mathrm{SHS}\to\mathrm{LJ}} is non-injective and non-surjective, the number of Lennard-Jones structures missing from the map is relatively small for cluster sizes up to N=13N=13, and most of the missing structures correspond to energetically unfavourable minima even for fairly low (m,n)(m,n). Furthermore, even the softest Lennard-Jones potential predicts that the coordination of 13 spheres around a central sphere is problematic (the Gregory-Newton problem). A more realistic extended Lennard-Jones potential chosen from coupled-cluster calculations for a rare gas dimer leads to a substantial increase in the number of nonisomorphic clusters, even though the potential curve is very similar to a (6,12)-Lennard-Jones potential.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1801.10290,
  title  = {From Sticky-Hard-Sphere to Lennard-Jones-Type Clusters},
  author = {Lukas Trombach and Robert S. Hoy and David J. Wales and Peter Schwerdtfeger},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10290},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

10 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-23T00:05:21.986Z