Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal
Abstract
Hellsten \cite{MR2026390} proved that when is -indescribable, the \emph{-club} subsets of provide a filter base for the -indescribability ideal, and hence can also be used to give a characterization of -indescribable sets which resembles the definition of stationarity: a set is -indescribable if and only if for every -club . By replacing clubs with -clubs in the definition of , one obtains a -like principle , a version of which was first considered by Brickhill and Welch \cite{BrickhillWelch}. The principle is consistent with the -indescribability of but inconsistent with the -indescribability of . By generalizing the standard forcing to add a -sequence, we show that if is -weakly compact and holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which remains -weakly compact and holds. If is -indescribable and holds then there is a cofinality-preserving forcing extension in which is -weakly compact, holds and every weakly compact subset of has a weakly compact proper initial segment. As an application, we prove that, relative to a -indescribable cardinal, it is consistent that is -weakly compact, every weakly compact subset of has a weakly compact proper initial segment, and there exist two weakly compact subsets and of such that there is no for which both and are weakly compact.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1902.04146,
title = {Forcing a $\square(\kappa)$-like principle to hold at a weakly compact cardinal},
author = {Brent Cody and Victoria Gitman and Chris Lambie-Hanson},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04146},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
Changed title and added citations to Brickhill-Welch