FAIR-MATCH: A Multi-Objective Framework for Bias Mitigation in Reciprocal Dating Recommendations
Abstract
Online dating platforms have fundamentally transformed the formation of romantic relationships, with millions of users worldwide relying on algorithmic matching systems to find compatible partners. However, current recommendation systems in dating applications suffer from significant algorithmic deficiencies, including but not limited to popularity bias, filter bubble effects, and inadequate reciprocity modeling that limit effectiveness and introduce harmful biases. This research integrates foundational work with recent empirical findings to deliver a detailed analysis of dating app recommendation systems, highlighting key issues and suggesting research-backed solutions. Through analysis of reciprocal recommendation frameworks, fairness evaluation metrics, and industry implementations, we demonstrate that current systems achieve modest performance with collaborative filtering reaching 25.1\% while reciprocal methods achieve 28.7\%. Our proposed mathematical framework addresses these limitations through enhanced similarity measures, multi-objective optimization, and fairness-aware algorithms that maintain competitive accuracy while improving demographic representation to reduce algorithmic bias.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2507.01063,
title = {FAIR-MATCH: A Multi-Objective Framework for Bias Mitigation in Reciprocal Dating Recommendations},
author = {Madhav Kotecha},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01063},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
This paper is withdrawn due to factual/methodological/other critical errors. It primarily synthesizes literature without original empirical validation/novel contributions (e.g., similarity measures from Xia et al.[2]; 28.7% claims from benchmarks). Core "proposed framework" lacks independent experiments, invalidating analysis. Do not cite prior versions