English

Extending Properly n-REA Sets

Logic 2022-12-20 v4

Abstract

In [5] Soare and Stob prove that if AA is an r.e. set which isn't computable then there is a set of the form AWeAA \oplus W^A_e which isn't of r.e. Turing degree. If we define a properly n+1n+1-REA set to be an n+1n+1-REA set which isn't Turing equivalent to any nn-REA set this result shows that every properly 1-REA set can be extended to a properly 2-REA set. This result was extended in [1] by Cholak and Hinman who proved that every 2-REA set can be extended to a properly 3-REA set. This leads naturally to the hypothesis that every properly nn-REA set can be extended to a properly n+1n+1-REA set. In this paper, we show this hypothesis is false and that there is a properly 33-REA set which can't be extended to a properly 44-REA set.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2107.01299,
  title  = {Extending Properly n-REA Sets},
  author = {Peter A. Cholak and Peter M. Gerdes},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01299},
  year   = {2022}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-24T03:51:28.803Z