English

Dominating Set Knapsack: Profit Optimization on Dominating Sets

Data Structures and Algorithms 2026-01-30 v3 Computational Complexity

Abstract

In a large-scale network, we want to choose some influential nodes to make a profit by paying some cost within a limited budget so that we do not have to spend more budget on some nodes adjacent to the chosen nodes; our problem is the graph-theoretic representation of it. We define our problem, Dominating Set Knapsack, by attaching the knapsack problem with the dominating set on graphs. Each vertex v (V)v~(\in V) is associated with a cost factor w(v)w(v) and a profit amount α(v)\alpha(v). We aim to choose some vertices within a fixed budget (s)(s) that give maximum profit so that we do not need to choose their 1-hop neighbors. We show that the Dominating Set Knapsack problem is strongly NPC even when restricted to bipartite graphs, but weakly NPC for star graphs. We present a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for trees in time O(nmin{s2,(α(V))2})O(n\cdot min\{s^2, (\alpha(V))^2\}). We show that Dominating Set Knapsack is unlikely to be Fixed Parameter Tractable (FPT) by proving that it is W[2]-hard parameterized by the solution size. We developed FPT algorithms with running time O(4twnO(1)min{s2,α(V)2})O(4^{tw}\cdot n^{O(1)} min\{s^2,{\alpha(V)}^2\}) and O(2vck1nO(1)min{s2,α(V)2})O(2^{vck-1}\cdot n^{O(1)} min\{s^2,{\alpha(V)}^2\}), where twtw represents the twtw of the given graph G(V,E)G(V,E), vckvck is the solution size of the Vertex Cover Knapsack, ss is the capacity or size of the knapsack and α(V)=vVα(v)\alpha(V)=\sum_{v\in V}\alpha(v). We obtained similar results for other variants kk-Dominating Set Knapsack and Minimal Dominating Set Knapsack, where kk is the size of the dominating set.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2506.24032,
  title  = {Dominating Set Knapsack: Profit Optimization on Dominating Sets},
  author = {Sipra Singh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.24032},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T03:39:50.624Z