Direct finiteness of representable regular rings with involution: A counterexample
Rings and Algebras
2024-09-11 v2
Abstract
Bruns and Roddy constructed a -generated modular ortholattice which cannot be embedded into any complete modular ortholattice. Motivated by their approach, we use shift operators to construct a -regular -ring of endomorphisms of an inner product space (which can be chosen as the Hilbert space ) such that direct finiteness fails for .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2408.16437,
title = {Direct finiteness of representable regular rings with involution: A counterexample},
author = {Christian Herrmann},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16437},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
As observed by Wehrung, the identity minus shift has no quasi-inverse in the ring of row and column finite matrices. Thus, the claimed example does not work