DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys
Abstract
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1 cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins. While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1 realizations in the plane. For one of the suites, we are able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred and are smaller than the DES Y1 uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive; we infer a roughly 70% probability that systematic biases in the recovered and are sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1803.09795,
title = {DES Y1 Results: Validating cosmological parameter estimation using simulated Dark Energy Surveys},
author = {N. MacCrann and J. DeRose and R. H. Wechsler and J. Blazek and E. Gaztanaga and M. Crocce and E. S. Rykoff and M. R. Becker and B. Jain and E. Krause and T. F. Eifler and D. Gruen and J. Zuntz and M. A. Troxel and J. Elvin-Poole and J. Prat and M. Wang and S. Dodelson and A. Kravtsov and P. Fosalba and M. T. Busha and A. E. Evrard and D. Huterer and T. M. C. Abbott and F. B. Abdalla and S. Allam and J. Annis and S. Avila and G. M. Bernstein and D. Brooks and E. Buckley-Geer and D. L. Burke and A. Carnero Rosell and M. Carrasco Kind and J. Carretero and F. J. Castander and R. Cawthon and C. E. Cunha and C. B. D'Andrea and L. N. da Costa and C. Davis and J. De Vicente and H. T. Diehl and P. Doel and J. Frieman and J. García-Bellido and D. W. Gerdes and R. A. Gruendl and G. Gutierrez and W. G. Hartley and D. Hollowood and K. Honscheid and B. Hoyle and D. J. James and T. Jeltema and D. Kirk and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and M. Lima and M. A. G. Maia and J. L. Marshall and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and A. A. Plazas and A. Roodman and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and M. Schubnell and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and M. Smith and R. C. Smith and M. Soares-Santos and F. Sobreira and E. Suchyta and M. E. C. Swanson and G. Tarle and D. Thomas and A. R. Walker and J. Weller},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09795},
year = {2018}
}
Comments
22 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS