Counting and enumerating optimum cut sets for hypergraph $k$-partitioning problems for fixed $k$
Abstract
We consider the problem of enumerating optimal solutions for two hypergraph -partitioning problems -- namely, Hypergraph--Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. The input in hypergraph -partitioning problems is a hypergraph with positive hyperedge costs along with a fixed positive integer . The goal is to find a partition of into non-empty parts -- known as a -partition -- so as to minimize an objective of interest. 1. If the objective of interest is the maximum cut value of the parts, then the problem is known as Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. A subset of hyperedges is a minmax--cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum -partition for Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. 2. If the objective of interest is the total cost of hyperedges crossing the -partition, then the problem is known as Hypergraph--Cut. A subset of hyperedges is a min--cut-set if it is the subset of hyperedges crossing an optimum -partition for Hypergraph--Cut. We give the first polynomial bound on the number of minmax--cut-sets and a polynomial-time algorithm to enumerate all of them in hypergraphs for every fixed . Our technique is strong enough to also enable an -time deterministic algorithm to enumerate all min--cut-sets in hypergraphs, thus improving on the previously known -time deterministic algorithm, where is the number of vertices and is the size of the hypergraph. The correctness analysis of our enumeration approach relies on a structural result that is a strong and unifying generalization of known structural results for Hypergraph--Cut and Minmax-Hypergraph--Partition. We believe that our structural result is likely to be of independent interest in the theory of hypergraphs (and graphs).
Cite
@article{arxiv.2204.09178,
title = {Counting and enumerating optimum cut sets for hypergraph $k$-partitioning problems for fixed $k$},
author = {Calvin Beideman and Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran and Weihang Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.09178},
year = {2023}
}
Comments
Accepted to ICALP'22. Claims 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5 in this work are similar to the claims in the proof of a structural theorem in arXiv: 2110.14815. Since the hypothesis of the theorem in this work is different from that of the theorem in arXiv: 2110.14815, complete proofs of these claims are presented. The usage of these claims in this work is also different from the usage in arXiv: 2110.14815. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2110.14815