Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning
Abstract
Understanding and predicting divertor heat-load width is a critically important problem for an easier and more robust operation of ITER with high fusion gain. Previous predictive simulation data for using the extreme-scale edge gyrokinetic code XGC1 in the electrostatic limit under attached divertor plasma conditions in three major US tokamaks [C.S. Chang et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 116023 (2017)] reproduced the Eich and Goldston attached-divertor formula results [formula #14 in T. Eich et al., Nucl. Fusion 53, 093031 (2013); R.J. Goldston, Nucl. Fusion 52, 013009 (2012)], and furthermore predicted over six times wider than the maximal Eich and Goldston formula predictions on a full-power (Q = 10) scenario ITER plasma. After adding data from further predictive simulations on a highest current JET and highest-current Alcator C-Mod, a machine learning program is used to identify a new scaling formula for as a simple modification to the Eich formula #14, which reproduces the Eich scaling formula for the present tokamaks and which embraces the wide for the full-current Q = 10 ITER plasma. The new formula is then successfully tested on three more ITER plasmas: two corresponding to long burning scenarios with Q = 5 and one at low plasma current to be explored in the initial phases of ITER operation. The new physics that gives rise to the wider ${\lambda}q_^{XGC} is identified to be the weakly-collisional, trapped-electron-mode turbulence across the magnetic separatrix, which is known to be an efficient transporter of the electron heat and mass. Electromagnetic turbulence and high-collisionality effects on the new formula are the next study topics for XGC1.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2012.10750,
title = {Constructing a new predictive scaling formula for ITER's divertor heat-load width informed by a simulation-anchored machine learning},
author = {C. S. Chang and S. Ku and R. Hager and R. M. Churchill and J. Hughes and F. Köchl and A. Loarte and V. Parail and R. Pitts},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.10750},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
23 pages, 16 figures, submitted to Physics of Plasmas