English

Constraints on the interacting vacuum -- geodesic CDM scenario

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2019-08-14 v2

Abstract

We investigate an interacting dark sector scenario in which the vacuum energy is free to interact with cold dark matter (CDM), which itself is assumed to cluster under the sole action of gravity, i.e. it is in free fall (geodesic), as in Λ\LambdaCDM. The interaction is characterised by a dimensionless coupling qVq_{\rm V} that we constrain using cosmic microwave background data from the Planck 2015 data release, along with baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift space distortion and Type Ia supernova measurements. We present the full linear perturbation theory of this interacting scenario and use MCMC sampling to study five different cases: two cases in which we have Λ\LambdaCDM evolution in the distant past, until a set redshift ztransz_{\rm trans}, below which the interaction switches on and qVq_{\rm V} is the single sampled parameter, with ztransz_{\rm trans} fixed at ztrans=3000z_{\rm trans}=3000 and ztrans=0.9z_{\rm trans}=0.9 respectively; a case where we allow this transition redshift to vary along with qVq_{\rm V}; a case in which the vacuum energy is zero for z>ztransz>z_{\rm trans} and then begins to grow once the interaction switches on; and the final case in which we bin qV(z)q_{\rm V}(z) in four redshift bins to investigate the possibility of a dynamical interaction, reconstructing the redshift evolution of the function using Gaussian processes. We find that, in all cases where the high redshift evolution is not modified, the results are compatible with a vanishing coupling, thus finding no significant deviation from Λ\LambdaCDM.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1902.10694,
  title  = {Constraints on the interacting vacuum -- geodesic CDM scenario},
  author = {Matteo Martinelli and Natalie B. Hogg and Simone Peirone and Marco Bruni and David Wands},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10694},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

17 pages, 14 figures. Version 2 aligns with the published MNRAS article (some model comparison discussion added with respect to version 1)

R2 v1 2026-06-23T07:53:21.653Z