English

Concordances to prime hyperbolic virtual knots

Geometric Topology 2020-03-31 v2

Abstract

Let Σ0,Σ1\Sigma_0,\Sigma_1 be closed oriented surfaces. Two oriented knots K0Σ0×[0,1]K_0 \subset \Sigma_0 \times [0,1] and K1Σ1×[0,1]K_1 \subset \Sigma_1 \times [0,1] are said to be (virtually) concordant if there is a compact oriented 33-manifold WW and a smoothly and properly embedded annulus AA in W×[0,1]W \times [0,1] such that W=Σ1Σ0\partial W=\Sigma_1 \sqcup -\Sigma_0 and A=K1K0\partial A=K_1 \sqcup -K_0. This notion of concordance, due to Turaev, is equivalent to concordance of virtual knots, due to Kauffman. A prime virtual knot, in the sense of Matveev, is one for which no thickened surface representative KΣ×[0,1]K \subset \Sigma \times [0,1] admits a nontrivial decomposition along a separating vertical annulus that intersects KK in two points. Here we prove that every knot KΣ×[0,1]K \subset \Sigma \times [0,1] is concordant to a prime satellite knot and a prime hyperbolic knot. For homologically trivial knots in Σ×[0,1]\Sigma \times [0,1], we prove this can be done so that the Alexander polynomial is preserved. This generalizes the corresponding results for classical knot concordance, due to Bleiler, Kirby-Lickorish, Livingston, Myers, Nakanishi, and Soma. The new challenge for virtual knots lies in proving primeness. Contrary to the classical case, not every hyperbolic knot in Σ×[0,1]\Sigma \times [0,1] is prime and not every composite knot is a satellite. Our results are obtained using a generalization of tangles in 33-balls we call complementary tangles. Properties of complementary tangles are studied in detail.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1904.05288,
  title  = {Concordances to prime hyperbolic virtual knots},
  author = {Micah Chrisman},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05288},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

32 pages, 25 figures; v2--typos corrected, some proofs streamlined

R2 v1 2026-06-23T08:35:40.303Z