Classical linear logic, cobordisms and categorial grammars
Abstract
We propose a categorial grammar based on classical multiplicative linear logic. This can be seen as an extension of abstract categorial grammars (ACG) and is at least as expressive. However, constituents of {\it linear logic grammars (LLG)} are not abstract -terms, but simply tuples of words with labeled endpoints and supplied with specific {\it plugging instructions}: the sets of endpoints are subdivided into the {\it incoming} and the {\it outgoing} parts. We call such objects {\it word cobordisms}. A key observation is that word cobordisms can be organized in a category, very similar to the familiar category of topological cobordisms. This category is symmetric monoidal closed and compact closed and thus is a model of linear -calculus and classical, as well as intuitionistic linear logic. This allows us using linear logic as a typing system for word cobordisms. At least, this gives a concrete and intuitive representation of ACG. We think, however, that the category of word cobordisms, which has a rich structure and is independent of any grammar, might be interesting on its own right.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1911.03962,
title = {Classical linear logic, cobordisms and categorial grammars},
author = {Sergey Slavnov},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03962},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
This is an improved version of the previously posted paper "Classical linear logic, cobordisms and categorical semantics of categorial grammars" with reduced amonunt of category theory, much simplified definitions and a number of examples. Also, a treatment of tree languages is added