BibAgent: An Agentic Framework for Traceable Miscitation Detection in Scientific Literature
Abstract
Citations are the bedrock of scientific authority, yet their integrity is compromised by widespread miscitations: ranging from nuanced distortions to fabricated references. Systematic citation verification is currently unfeasible; manual review cannot scale to modern publishing volumes, while existing automated tools are restricted by abstract-only analysis or small-scale, domain-specific datasets in part due to the "paywall barrier" of full-text access. We introduce BibAgent, a scalable, end-to-end agentic framework for automated citation verification. BibAgent integrates retrieval, reasoning, and adaptive evidence aggregation, applying distinct strategies for accessible and paywalled sources. For paywalled references, it leverages a novel Evidence Committee mechanism that infers citation validity via downstream citation consensus. To support systematic evaluation, we contribute a 5-category Miscitation Taxonomy and MisciteBench, a massive cross-disciplinary benchmark comprising 6,350 miscitation samples spanning 254 fields. Our results demonstrate that BibAgent outperforms state-of-the-art Large Language Model (LLM) baselines in citation verification accuracy and interpretability, providing scalable, transparent detection of citation misalignments across the scientific literature.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2601.16993,
title = {BibAgent: An Agentic Framework for Traceable Miscitation Detection in Scientific Literature},
author = {Peiran Li and Fangzhou Lin and Shuo Xing and Xiang Zheng and Xi Hong and Siyuan Yang and Jiashuo Sun and Zhengzhong Tu and Chaoqun Ni},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16993},
year = {2026}
}