Analogy, Mind, and Life
Abstract
I'll show that the kind of analogy between life and information [argue for by authors such as Davies (2000), Walker and Davies (2013), Dyson (1979), Gleick (2011), Kurzweil (2012), Ward (2009)], that seems to be central to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe, is like the design argument and that if the design argument is unfounded and invalid, the argument to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe is also unfounded and invalid. However, if we are prepared to admit (though we should not do) this method of reasoning as valid, I'll show that the analogy between life and information to the effect that artificial mind may represents an expected advance in the life evolution in Universe seems suggest some type of reductionism of life to information, but biology respectively chemistry or physics are not reductionist, contrary to what seems to be suggested by the analogy between life and information.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2012.13803,
title = {Analogy, Mind, and Life},
author = {Vitor Manuel Dinis Pereira},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.13803},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
27 pages, 0 figures, chapter book, (2015).Tran, Q-N. and Arabnia, H.R. (eds.). Emerging Trends in Computational Biology, Bioinformatics, and Systems Biology. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann