An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Evaluation and Experimental Design for Visual Text Analytics: Position Paper
Abstract
Appropriate evaluation and experimental design are fundamental for empirical sciences, particularly in data-driven fields. Due to the successes in computational modeling of languages, for instance, research outcomes are having an increasingly immediate impact on end users. As the gap in adoption by end users decreases, the need increases to ensure that tools and models developed by the research communities and practitioners are reliable, trustworthy, and supportive of the users in their goals. In this position paper, we focus on the issues of evaluating visual text analytics approaches. We take an interdisciplinary perspective from the visualization and natural language processing communities, as we argue that the design and validation of visual text analytics include concerns beyond computational or visual/interactive methods on their own. We identify four key groups of challenges for evaluating visual text analytics approaches (data ambiguity, experimental design, user trust, and "big picture" concerns) and provide suggestions for research opportunities from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2209.11534,
title = {An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Evaluation and Experimental Design for Visual Text Analytics: Position Paper},
author = {Kostiantyn Kucher and Nicole Sultanum and Angel Daza and Vasiliki Simaki and Maria Skeppstedt and Barbara Plank and Jean-Daniel Fekete and Narges Mahyar},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11534},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Published in Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Workshop on Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches to Visualization (BELIV '22). ACM 2012 CCS: Human-centered computing, Visualization, Visualization design and evaluation methods