English

All Classical Adversary Methods are Equivalent for Total Functions

Computational Complexity 2018-11-13 v3

Abstract

We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions, and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity fbs(f)\text{fbs}(f). That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is equivalent to a simpler lower bound, which we call rank-1 relational adversary. For partial functions, we show unbounded separations between fbs(f)\text{fbs}(f) and other adversary bounds, as well as between the adversary bounds themselves. We also show that, for partial functions, fractional block sensitivity cannot give lower bounds larger than nbs(f)\sqrt{n \cdot \text{bs}(f)}, where nn is the number of variables and bs(f)\text{bs}(f) is the block sensitivity. Then we exhibit a partial function ff that matches this upper bound, fbs(f)=Ω(nbs(f))\text{fbs}(f) = \Omega(\sqrt{n \cdot \text{bs}(f)}).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1709.08985,
  title  = {All Classical Adversary Methods are Equivalent for Total Functions},
  author = {Andris Ambainis and Martins Kokainis and Krišjānis Prūsis and Jevgēnijs Vihrovs and Aleksejs Zajakins},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08985},
  year   = {2018}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T21:55:11.525Z