Related papers: Remarks on Universal Quantum Computer
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, because a profoundly overhauled and improved version, also with a new title and two more authors, has now been submitted to the arXiv, with no. hep-ph/0310059. In view of the elapsed time and the…
This paper was withdrawn and incorporated into section II of cond-mat/0310512
This is a short introduction to quantum computers, quantum algorithms and quantum error correcting codes. Familiarity with the principles of quantum theory is assumed. Emphasis is put on a concise presentation of the principles avoiding…
The paper has been withdrawn
This paper has been withdrawn, as it has been merged into arXiv:1009.6144
This note is a comment on the "quantum interferometry" section of Reference [1]. It points out that the methods of that section can be applied to more general states than the ones that are discussed in Ref. [1].
This paper has been withdrawn.
This is a review of the paper "Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory and Cohomologies of Configuration Spaces" (arXiv:0903.0187).
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in eq.59. I apologize for the inconveniences.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.
This paper has been withdrawn
A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].
This paper was withdrawn on 20.11.97.
This paper was withdrawn. It has been superseded by the latest version of hep-th/0107069.
This is a reply to the comment by Yuan et al. [arXiv:1009.6130v1] on our publication [arXiv:1008.4593].
A few remarks on hep-ph/9612213 are given.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author because the result obtained has been reported earlier by other authors.
We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]
In the recently posted arXiv:2312.04495v3 [1], its authors used a computer code written by me supplied to them by the authors of Ref. [2], and claimed that the results that they obtained invalidate the results and conclusions presented in…