English
Related papers

Related papers: Reply to 'Comment on "Detuning effects in the one-…

200 papers

We reply to L.P. Grishchuk's comment (gr-qc/9801011) on our paper ``The Influence of Cosmological Transitions on the Evolution of Density Perturbations'' (Phys. Rev. D 57, 3302, 1998). We show that his points of criticism are not correct.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Physics 2007-05-23 Jerome Martin , Dominik J. Schwarz

We reply to the criticism raised by Volovik in his Comment (cond-mat/9805159) and by Hirschfeld et al. in their Comment (cond-mat/9806085).

Superconductivity · Physics 2007-05-23 N. Schopohl , O. V. Dolgov

We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

Quantum Physics · Physics 2019-03-06 Berthold-Georg Englert , Kelvin Horia , Jibo Dai , Yink Loong Len , Hui Khoon Ng

In a recent comment [1], Masud Mansuripur presented some concerns with theoretical and experimental interpretations of She's paper [2], and concluded that She's conclusion is incorrect. We agree that, some of the She's work required further…

Optics · Physics 2009-07-28 Huakang Yu , Wei Fang , Limin Tong

Marchildon's arguments against my earlier work are refuted.

Quantum Physics · Physics 2007-05-23 Partha Ghose

The authors of preprint arXiv:1810.00565 and paper in Light: Science & Applications (2019), Y. Dubi and Y. Sivan, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on several of our papers. In addition, the paper in Faraday Discuss. 214, 215-233…

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Physics 2020-10-15 Alexander O. Govorov , Lucas V. Besteiro

In a comment on my recent manuscript on the pi-particle [cond-mat/9705049], Demler et al. [cond-mat/9705191] argued that there is a correction to the chemical potential which enters the expression for the energy of the pi-particle given in…

Superconductivity · Physics 2008-02-03 Martin Greiter

In a recent preprint, arXiv 2005.03716v1, G. Wegner and C. Henkel criticized my work on the possibility of lossless surface plasma waves. Here I refute all of their criticisms.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Physics 2020-09-15 Hai-Yao Deng

I show that the claims in Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 257602 by Betouras et al concerning YMn2O5 are incorect.

Materials Science · Physics 2007-07-11 A. B. Harris

Two objections have been raised to the arguments presented in O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 80 (1999). It is pointed out that neither objection has anything whatsoever to do with the main subject matter of that paper, and shown that both…

Quantum Physics · Physics 2009-11-06 Oliver Cohen

This article focuses on correcting several factual errors and critiques in the previously published Letter in Phys. Rev. L, Vol. 89, No. 10, 2022, by D. Shapira and M. Saltmarsh. The authors of the Letter did not perform their own…

In a recent publication [PRL 111, 160405 (2013)] we proved a version of Heisenberg's error-disturbance tradeoff. This result was in apparent contradiction to claims by Ozawa of having refuted these ideas of Heisenberg. In a direct reaction…

Quantum Physics · Physics 2014-02-14 P. Busch , P. Lahti , R. F. Werner

We settle the fusion product decomposition theorem for higher-level affine Demazure modules for the cases $E^{(1)}_{6, 7, 8}, F^{(1)}_4$ and $E^{(2)}_{6}$, thus completing the main theorems of Chari et al. (J. Algebra, 2016) and Kus et al.…

Representation Theory · Mathematics 2021-02-22 R. Venkatesh , Sankaran Viswanath

In a recent comment [arXiv:1405.2978v1 (2014)] Romanenko and Grassellino made unsubstantiated statements about our work [Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 092601 (2014)] and ascribed to us wrong points which we had not made. Here we show that the…

Accelerator Physics · Physics 2015-06-19 G. Ciovati , P. Dhakal , A. Gurevich

We respond to the criticism raised in the paper arXiv:1704.07831.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2017-05-30 Gian F. Giudice , Matthew McCullough

We reply to a recent comment by Bhattacharya et. al. (cond-mat/9812290) on our previous Letter (PRL 81, 5640 (1998)).

Superconductivity · Physics 2008-07-09 Mei-Rong Li , P. J. Hirschfeld , P. Woelfle

In this manuscript we reply to the criticisms of our paper [Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 437 (2005)] raised in a recent preprint by Achasov and Kiselev [hep-ph/0606268] and demonstrate that all their criticisms are completely irrelevant and…

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2007-05-23 Yu. S. Kalashnikova , A. E. Kudryavtsev , A. V. Nefediev , J. Haidenbauer , C. Hanhart

This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].

Classical Physics · Physics 2008-12-31 Jose A. Heras

In a Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 029801 (2014)] on our Letter on self-propelled asymmetric particles [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 198302 (2013); arXiv:1302.5787], Felderhof claims that our theory based on Langevin equations would be…

A recent e-print (cond-mat/0604532) presented a proposed Comment to Applied Physics Letters on our publication Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 162503 (2006), cond-mat/0603260. Here is our Response. As the proposed Comment has now been rejected by…

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Physics 2007-05-23 Michael E. Flatté , Kimberley C. Hall
‹ Prev 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 Next ›