Related papers: Comments on "Evidence for Quantized Displacement i…

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

This paper comments on the recently reported quantum oscillations in underdoped YBCO crystals. The implications to other experiments and some hurdles to validating the proposed interpretation are discussed.

In a recent comment [1], Masud Mansuripur presented some concerns with theoretical and experimental interpretations of She's paper [2], and concluded that She's conclusion is incorrect. We agree that, some of the She's work required further…

comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 042302 (2009)

The main result of Xiao et al. [ Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005)] is shown to follow from Hamiltonian mechanics.

We respond to comments in arXiv:2502.15817v2 about our article, arXiv:2412.12282. We stand by our conclusions and defend them against the criticisms.

Comment on paper "Towards a bulk theory of flexoelectricity" by R.Resta [Phys.Rew. Lett. v. 105, 127601 (2010)]

This is a comment on the paper ``Electron Mass Operator in a Strong Magnetic Field and Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking" by A. V. Kuznetsov and N. V. Mikheev [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011601]. We show that the main conclusions of the…

This is a Comment on Phys.Rev.Lett. 100, 017001 (2008).

Comment on X.-L. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253602 (2010).

Preface, introduction and contents to the book "Theory of Quantum Transport at Nanoscale", published in 2016 by Springer, the author version.

A non-trivial q-deformation of the fermionic oscillator proposed by us in 1991 is recalled in view of the result of the paper cited in the title.

We argue that the constraints on transfers, given in the Letter [G. Plunk and T. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 106}, 165003 (2011)], but not correctly, do not give the transfer and/or cascade directions which however can be assisted by the…

We comment on a recent Letter in Phys. Rev. Lett. (M. Kafesaki, R. S. Penciu, and E. N. Economou, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 6050 (2000))

A Comment on the Letter by Granger et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135506 (2002).

A recent paper by Bluemer et al. [cond-mat/0609758] again criticizes earlier QMC/DMFT results by Liebsch [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 70}, 165103 (2004)]. This criticism is shown to be unfounded.

This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].

A Comment on the Letter by C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 221601 (2014) [arXiv:1408.3995]

Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).