Related papers: Electronic coherence theory

This paper has been withdrawn by the author since the proof of Lemma 8 is not correct.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, because a better treatment is given in the author's Phd. thesis (Sections 3.4.6 and 4.4), now available on the arxiv.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to error in equation (46).

The paper was withdrawn by the authors

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because the conclusions reached in it are incorrect.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) in the light of several other works available and due to a misunderstanding in the authorships.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to the discovery of paper 0201028 which predates it and contains most of it's results.

The paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. This paper is now obsolete. For a solution please see: arXiv:/1205.4265.

The paper is being withdrawn. A new submission will follow.

The paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s). The material contained in the paper will be published in a subtantially reorganized form, part of it is now included in math.QA/0510174

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in Proof of Theorem 1.1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to some mistakes

The paper is withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the wave packet propagation used in the ion-dynamics calculation did not allow for electron-nuclei correlation. Hence, the conclusion that the ion-dynamics model is not in agreement with…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to inconsistency of the considered working hypothesis. The consistent treatment is presented in the last publications of the author.

The paper has been withdrawn.

The paper is withdrawn because the analysis appeared to be incomplete.