Related papers: Comments on some papers by M. Koashi and N. Imoto
This paper was withdrawn by the authors.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to possible counter-examples.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial error in the optimization. For the last one month I have been trying to remove the error, but it seems to take a lot of time so I decided to withdraw this paper for the moment.
The paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn at the author's request.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author for further investigation.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a mistake in the proof of the chief result. In particular Theorem 1.3 is correct, while Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 hold with \mu>0 and a suitable restriction on the exponent p. The proof…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author ali pourmohammad.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to a flaw in the proof of Theorem 1. This preprint is superseded by quant-ph/0610027, where a correct proof can be found. Thanks to Rainer Siegmund-Schultze for spotting the error.
This paper has been withdrawn.
The paper has been withdrawn because the result of math.QA/0002057 "Deformation quantization with traces" holds only for a constant volume form.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to need of essential revision.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to crucial error in formula (14) which does not satisfy conditions for S(x,y) domain if only d>2.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) and included into the new version of "An extension theorem for separately holomorphic functions with singularities", math.CV/0104089.
This paper is withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author in favor of a stronger result proven by the author with R. Frank and T. Weidl in arXiv:0707.0998
This paper has been withdrawn by the author [arXiv admin].
This paper is withdrawn because of an error in Lemma 3.1