Related papers: The existance of unconditionally secure quantum bi…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author.
This paper has been withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors,because the proposed protocol is still coverd by the no-go theorem of Mayers, Lo and Chau. We thank H-K. Lo and HF Chau for helpful correspondences.
This paper has been withdrawn: it does not evade the no-go results of Mayers, Lo and Chau, to whom I am most grateful for helpful correspondences.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper is withdrawn. See quant-ph/9806031 for a discussion.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to the insecurity against attacks received in quant-ph/0605027v5.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn due to security loophole. We thank Dr G. P. he for pointing this to us.
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the incorrect argument for the security.
This paper was withdrawn on 20.11.97.
The paper was retracted.
The paper has been withdrawn by the author since the protocol is not new. It is just the oldest version of BB84.
This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because the results obtained have been reported earlier by other authors.
This paper has been withdrawn.
The impossibility proof on unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is critically reviewed. Different ways of obtaining secure protocols are indicated.
This paper devises a simple quantum bit commitment protocol that is just as easy to implement as any existing practical quantum bit commitment protocols but will be more secure. It will be infinitely close to being unconditionally fully…
The ``impossibility proof'' on unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is examined. It is shown that the possibility of juxtaposing quantum and classical randomness has not been properly taken into account. A specific protocol that…