Related papers: Comments on "On Bohm trajectories in two-particle …

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors since it was strongly elaborated, some new sections appeared. This made the paper significantly differ from current version. Besides two new authors participated in the work. So the authors…

The result in theorem 2.1 has been strengthened (see theorem 2.3) and the remarks in the introduction and the text adapted to this new result. Also some misprints in the previous version have been corrected.

Withdrawn -- a revised version will appear in due course.

The paper has been withdrawn

This note points out that the assertions of [1] are groundless and incorrect.

We show that the ``effective Lagrangian'' constructed in [1] is inconsistent with the exact result for the complete Lagrangian presented in [2]. We trace the origin of the inconsistence to the peculiar way in which the path integral methods…

In a recent paper, Struyve et al. [Struyve W, De Baere W, De Neve J and De Weirdt S 2003 J. Phys. A 36 1525] attempted to show that the thought experiment proposed in [Golshani M and Akhavan O 2001 J. Phys. A 34 5259, quant-ph/0103101]…

A comment has been recently posted on the arXiv (arXiv:1902.07504) that discuss our recent work on encircling multiple exceptional points in Nat. Commun. 9, 4808 (2018). In that comment, the authors claim that our approach is prone to…

This article has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators because it plagiarises arXiv:1006.4556 (published in Phys. Lett. B 693, 129 (2010)).

This is a reply to the comment by A. W. Sandvik (cond-mat/0010433) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4204 (2000). We show that his data do not conflict with our data nor with our conclusions.

It is shown that the proposal of Ref. [1] of Casimir repulsion and nanolevitation based on chiral metamaterials is incompatible with the passivity and causality of the materials.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. Proofs of two propositions need more details.

The paper has been withdrawn by the authors. See newer and expanded version quant-ph/0606221, published in Europhysics Letters 78, 30004 (2007).

We comment on a recent paper by Chaichian et al. (Phys.Rev.Lett. 71(1993)3405).

We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

"Development of biomechanical response corridors of the thorax to blunt ballistic impacts" (Bir, C., Viano, D., King, A., 2004, Journal of Biomechanics 37, 73-79.) contains apparent measurement errors. Areas under several force vs. time…

We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by P. J. Mart\'{\i}nez and R. Chac\'on [arXiv:2105.09308] on our paper Phys. Rev. E \textbf{97}, 032219 (2018). We first show that our paper is free of any mistakes and that the criticism…

This article is a thorough critique to the Plakhutin-Davidson's comments made to our paper published in the recent year. A detailed critical examination of the arguments that led to the suggested comments by Plakhutin and Davidson reveals…

We show that the claims expressed in the Comment arXiv:0810.3244v1 by R.S. Decca et al against our paper, D.A.R. Dalvit and S.K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 163203 (2008), are wrong and manifestly inconsistent with basic…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.