Related papers: Comments on "On Bohm trajectories in two-particle …
In this comment we wish to clarify and correct some of the statements made in a recent paper by E. G. Mishchenko (Europhys. Lett. 83 (2008) 17005).
We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].
This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].
The Comment by Xiong et al. (arXiv:1610.06275) criticizing my Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)] was rejected by Physical Review Letters. In this Reply, I show that all their claims are wrong.
Withdrawn by the author. Further research is needed.
In a comment cond-mat/9811080 to our paper (PRL, vol 81, 1698 (1998)) H. Bokil, A. Bray, B. Drossel and M. Moore claimed that we have reached wrong conclusions. We show here why their claims are not correct, especially when compared to the…
This paper has been withdrawn.
Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2086 (2001)
This is a Reply to the Comment posted as arXiv:1207.1261.
Interesting objections to conclusions of our experiment with nested interferometers raised by Salih in a recent Commentary are analysed and refuted.
To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. together with the author's Reply.
This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].
In a recent Letter, Altshuler and Maslov propose a model which attributes the anomalous temperature and field dependence of the resistivity of two-dimensional electron (or hole) systems to the charging and discharging of traps in the oxide…
In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm's theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm's theory to be…
The criticism of the experiment showing disconnected traces of photons passing through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer is shown to be unfounded.
We comment on recent e-print by L. Mardoyan et al. [cond-mat/0609768]
We show that the remarks of V.\ Petrov in the preceding Comment are misdirected in the region of very small momentum transfers relevant to the study of Coulomb-nuclear interference in proton-proton scattering, and clarify the connection…
It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.
We refute in this Reply the criticisms made by M. Abdel-Aty [Phys. Rev. A 70, 047801 (2004)]. We show that none of them are founded and we demonstrate very explicitly what is wrong in the arguments developed by this author.
Hornberger and Vacchini [Phys. Rev. A82, 036101 (2010); arxiv:0907.3018] claim that the specific collisional momentum decoherence, pointed out in my recent work [Phys. Rev. A80, 064104 (2009); arXiv:0905.3908], is already described by their…