Related papers: Quantum Computation Relative to Oracles

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn: it does not evade the no-go results of Mayers, Lo and Chau, to whom I am most grateful for helpful correspondences.

This is a 1-page comment on a wrong paper that recently appeared in PRL (Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (23), 5393 (2001), also quant-ph/0101004). The authors claim to have shown that using a quantum computer gives an "exponential advantage" for…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a critical error in the proof of Theorem A pointed out by Burkhard Wilking.

This paper has been withdrawn because the first author submitted the paper without previously consulting the rest of the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because there are some typos in proofs.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in conclusion .

This paper has been temporarily withdrawn for corrections.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error in equation 12.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.

The paper has been withdrawn by the authors

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a fatal flaw in the central proof.

This is an erratum to our previously published paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a crucial error in page 5.

Withdrawn by arXiv administration because authors have forged affiliations and acknowledgements, and have not adequately responded to charges [hep-th/9912039] of unattributed use of verbatim material.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, the main result being known since Lam and Leung, J. Algebra 2000.

This paper has been withdrawn.