Related papers: Comment on "R\"{o}ntgen Quantum Phase Shift: A Sem…

A reply to the comment by V. R. Shaginyan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 279701 (2011), arXiv:1206.5372] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

A Comment on the Letter by P. Kratzer and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 036102 (2002).

Reply to Comment quant-ph/0506207 by J.G.Brankov et al.

Comment on the Letter by W. Rantner and X-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.86, p.3871 (2001).

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).

It is a comment on a paper titled "Reversibility of magnetic field driven transition from electronic phase separation state to single-phase state in manganites: A microscopic view" by Liu et al. Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 195154.

This paper has been withdrawn due to the heavy reliance on the fraudulent experiments of Schoen. Note that part of the paper has been published in D.F. Agterberg, Physica C 387, 13 (2003).

This is a comment on [Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 243004 (2003)] by Marlan O. Scully, Vitaly V. Kocharovsky, Alexey Belyanin, Edward Fry and Federico Capasso (quant-ph/0305178).

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).

Comment on Phys. Rev. A 79, 052312 (2009), http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v79/i5/e052312

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. {\bf B80}, 174403 (2009)] Kotov {\it et al.} studied the paramagnetic-to-antiferromagnetic transition in the $J$-$Q$ model. Their findings were claimed to be in "fairly good agreement" with previous quantum…

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

We explain why the analysis in our paper [Phys. Rev. D 69, 064033 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311064 ] is relevant and correct.

We argue that our analysis of the J-Q model, presented in Phys. Rev. B 80, 174403 (2009), and based on a field-theory description of coupled dimers, captures properly the strong quantum fluctuations tendencies, and the objections outlined…

A Comment on the Letter by B. Kraus {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}{\bf 104}, 020504 (2010).

Certain comments on the paper of Yu.V. Orlov, B. F. Irgaziev and L. I. Nikitina published in Phys.At.Nuclei, {\bf 73} (2010) 757 are made.

Comment on "Enhanced transmission through periodic arrays of subwavelength holes: the role of localized waveguide resonances" [Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 233901 (2006)]

A Comment on the paper "Quantum waveguide array generator for performing Fourier transforms: Alternate route to quantum computing" by R. Akis and D.K. Ferry, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2823 (2001). The authors reply in Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2420…

Comment on X.-L. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253602 (2010).