Related papers: Comment on "Classical and Quantum Interaction of t…

This paper is a Comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1516 (2000) by A.V. Uskov, A.-P. Jauho, B. Tromborg, J. Mork, and R. Lang.

This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).

This paper examines the theory of electron magnetic dipole moment interactions with magnetic fields or other electrons in classical and quantum electrodynamics. We show that these interactions may be described by a version of the Poynting…

This is a Reply on the proceeding comment on our paper titled "Classical Simulations Including Electron Correlations for Sequential Double Ionization".

In this short note we amplify our comments on the paper PRL 95,010405 (2005).

We make comments on Gaidarzhy {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 94, 030402 (2005)] letter.

We analyze a recent treatment of the interaction of a magnetic quadrupole moment with a radial electric field for a non-relativistic particle in a rotating frame and show that the derivation of the equations in the paper is anything but…

We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].

Comment on X.-L. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253602 (2010).

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

This is a comment on publication in Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 087205 (2003): ``Exchange interaction parameters and adiabatic spin-wave spectra of ferromagnets: A `renormalized magnetic force theorem'''

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

A Comment on the Letter by Atsushi Ikeda and Kunimasa Miyazaki, [arXiv:1003.5472v2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 255704 (2010)].

Response to comment by Finn et al.

A comment on the paper by Lopez et al. [A. Lopez, Z. Z. Sun, and J. Schliemann, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205428 (2012)].

A comment to the paper by S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087205 (2001)].

Comment on T. M. Squires and M. P. Brenner, Phys.Rev.Lett. 85, 4976 (2000)

We make remarks on Ristroph and Zhang's [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 101, 194502 (2008)] paper.

We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.

We comment on a recent paper by Chaichian et al. (Phys.Rev.Lett. 71(1993)3405).