Related papers: Comment on "Roentgen quantum phase shift: a semicl…

This paper is Comment on the paper: S.A.R. Horsley and M. Babiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010405 (2005).

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

Please goto the "Note Added" part of v6, quant-ph/0501143

We make comments on Gaidarzhy {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 94, 030402 (2005)] letter.

The aim of this communication is to correct inaccurate statements presented in a Commentary on the paper titled: "Radiation forces and torque on a rigid elliptical cylinder in acoustical plane progressive and (quasi)standing waves with…

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].

We have reviewed the comment in [3], posted on arXiv.org concerning our recent work in [1]. We reply to the comment in this paper.

Comment on Phys. Rev. A 79, 052312 (2009), http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v79/i5/e052312

A talk presented at "String Gravity and Physics at the Planck Energy Scale", Erice, September 1995, summarizing the current understanding of the electroweak phase transition.

We comment on the paper published in PRL 112, 010403 (2014).

comment on cond-mat/97063007 and cond-mat/9707289

This is a Comment on the Article ``Aging, phase ordering and conformal invariance'' by M.Henkel, M.Pleimling, C.Godr\`eche and J.M.Luck [Phys.Rev.Lett. 87, 265701 (2001)].

This is a reply to the comment by A. W. Sandvik (cond-mat/0010433) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4204 (2000). We show that his data do not conflict with our data nor with our conclusions.

We are submitting a comment on the paper "Quantum Opacity, the RHIC HBT Puzzle, and the Chiral Phase Transition" by J.G. Cramer, G.A. Miller, J.M.S. Wu and J. Yoon, published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102302 (2005).

Comment on "Enhanced transmission through periodic arrays of subwavelength holes: the role of localized waveguide resonances" [Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 233901 (2006)]

Critiques presented by P. Grassberger in Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140601 (2005) are addressed.

We show that the comment [cond-mat/0408217] by Continentino on our recent paper [PRL 91, 066404 (2003), cond-mat/0212335] reaches incorrect conclusions as the comment wrongly extrapolates from results valid close to a classical phase…

It is a comment on a paper titled "Reversibility of magnetic field driven transition from electronic phase separation state to single-phase state in manganites: A microscopic view" by Liu et al. Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 195154.

This paper uncovers a pitfall in the phase transition mechanism of Vicsek et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995)] which occurs with fairly high probability and leads to complete breakdown of the model dynamics.

We explain why the analysis in our paper [Phys. Rev. D 69, 064033 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311064 ] is relevant and correct.