Related papers: The L^p-continuity of the wave operators for the t…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial error in Eq. 6.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a oversimplified decoherence model. It will be substituted by a new work.

This paper has been withdrawn because Proposition 2.2 (c) is false. This invalids the main results of section 2 and 3. We thank A. Canonaco for pointing us the error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial mistake in proof of lemma 4.2.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the presented idea is wrong.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in Lemma 3.5.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in an inequality in the proof of Theorem 1.1.

This paper has been withdrawn to provide a more rigorous proof of the converse of Theorem 1 and Lemma 1 as well.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in Theorem 3.4.

This paper has been withdrawn, since it contains a corollary with impossible consequences and the source of an error is currently unknown.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because it has been submitted to a journal.

This note was an attempt to complete a gap in the proof of Theorem 11.1 of the paper arXiv:1111.5992. Due to a critical gap in the proof of Lemma 4.3, this paper is withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn because there is a fundamental error in the computations; with the right computational scheme it seems to be just a version of the Jones polynomial

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to errors.

This paper has been withdrawn.