Related papers: Correction. Improper regular conditional distribut…
We correct some intermediate expressions and arguments in hep-lat/0002009 (Nucl. Phys. B 585 (2000) 471--513). The main results do not change. We also mention some additional observations, including a constraint on a coefficient of the…
Some empirical results are more likely to be published than others. Such selective publication leads to biased estimates and distorted inference. This paper proposes two approaches for identifying the conditional probability of publication…
We correct a common (but mistaken) attribution of the evaluation of the probability integral, usually attributed to Poisson, Gauss, or Laplace.
This is an erratum to our paper.
In this article we give corrections and addendum to the article ``Flops and Poisson deformations of symplectic varieties, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. {\bf 44} (2008) 259 - 314''.
In Moral, Campos (1991) and Cano, Moral, Verdegay-Lopez (1991) a new method of conditioning convex sets of probabilities has been proposed. The result of it is a convex set of non-necessarily normalized probability distributions. The…
The purpose of this paper is to present a mathematical theory that can be used as a foundation for statistics that include improper priors. This theory includes improper laws in the initial axioms and has in particular Bayes theorem as a…
This note corrects conditions in Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 5.2(ii) and comments on imprecisions in Propositions 4.2 and 4.4 in Fissler and Ziegel (2016).
This paper corrects some mathematical errors in Holmstr\"om (1999) and clarifies the assumptions that are sufficient for the results of Holmstr\"om (1999). The results remain qualitatively the same.
Corrections and acknowledgment for ``Local limit theory and large deviations for supercritical branching processes'' [math.PR/0407059]
This purpose of this letter is to handle a gap that was found in the proof of Theorem 2 in the paper "The generalized stochastic likelihood decoder: random coding and expurgated bounds."
A comment on a misleading statement contained in [Phys. Rev. A 97, 062115 (2018)]. v2: a typo corrected
Rejoinder to "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]
A recent paper [1] (El Aroudi, 2012) misapplied a critical condition (Fang and Abed, 2001) to a well-known example. Even if the mistake is corrected, the results in [1] are applicable only to buck converters and period-doubling bifurcation.…
Erratum to "From Uncertainty Principles to Wegner Estimates".
The incorporation of systematic uncertainties into confidence interval calculations has been addressed recently in a paper by Conrad et al. (Physical Review D 67 (2003) 012002). In their work, systematic uncertainities in detector…
Estimate (3.39) which appears in the proof of Proposition 3.4 in [Ann. Probab. 27 (1999) 1414--1467, doi:10.1214/aop/1022677454] is wrong. We present below a corrected proof which introduces an extra factor 2 in equations (3.34) and (3.35).…
There are some inaccuracies and errors in my article "Dual and almost-dual homogeneous spaces". Here I will describe in detail how to correct incorrect statements from this article and which statements there will have to be reformulated in…
In the note two errors in Low and Lapsley's article "Optimization Flow Control, I: Basic Algorithm and Convergence", "IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking", 7(6), pp. 861-874, 1999, are shown. Because of these errors the proofs of both…
This note gives an informal overview of the proof in our paper "Borel Conjecture and Dual Borel Conjecture", see arXiv:1105.0823.