Related papers: Rejoinder to "Analysis of variance--why it is more…

Discussion of ``Analysis of variance--why it is more important than ever'' by A. Gelman [math.ST/0504499]

Discussion of ``Analysis of variance--why it is more important than ever'' by A. Gelman [math.ST/0504499]

Discussion of ``Analysis of variance--why it is more important than ever'' by A. Gelman [math.ST/0504499]

Discussion of ``Analysis of variance--why it is more important than ever'' by A. Gelman [math.ST/0504499]

Rejoinder of "Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective" by Guido W. Imbens [arXiv:1410.0163].

Rejoinder to ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Rejoinder to ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]

Rejoinder to ``Support Vector Machines with Applications'' [math.ST/0612817]

Rejoinder to "Multiple Testing for Exploratory Research" by J. J. Goeman, A. Solari [arXiv:1208.2841].

Rejoinder of ``Cross-Covariance Functions for Multivariate Geostatistics'' by Genton and Kleiber [arXiv:1507.08017].

Rejoinder to "Likelihood Inference for Models with Unobservables: Another View" by Youngjo Lee and John A. Nelder [arXiv:1010.0303]

Rejoinder to "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is an extremely important method in exploratory and confirmatory data analysis. Unfortunately, in complex problems (e.g., split-plot designs), it is not always easy to set up an appropriate ANOVA. We propose a…

Rejoinder to ``The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when $p$ is much larger than $n$'' [math/0506081]

Rejoinder of "Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets" by Szab\'o, van der Vaart and van Zanten [arXiv:1310.4489v5].

This is a complement to my previous article "Advanced Determinant Calculus" (S\'eminaire Lotharingien Combin. 42 (1999), Article B42q, 67 pp.). In the present article, I share with the reader my experience of applying the methods described…

Rejoinder to "The Future of Indirect Evidence" [arXiv:1012.1161]

Comment on "The Need for Syncretism in Applied Statistics" [arXiv:1012.1161]

Rejoinder to "Multivariate quantiles and multiple-output regression quantiles: From $L_1$ optimization to halfspace depth" by M. Hallin, D. Paindaveine and M. Siman [arXiv:1002.4486]

Rejoinder to ``Breakdown and groups'' by P. L. Davies and U. Gather [math.ST/0508497]