Related papers: A geometric decomposition of Harish-Chandra module…

This paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to several major changes in concepts and results. New version will follow briefly as a new e-print.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to some technical problems in the paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.

The paper has been withdrawn by change of content and some errors in the examples.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to errors in the figures.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a sheaf-theoretic error, in the end of the proof of the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial error in the optimization. For the last one month I have been trying to remove the error, but it seems to take a lot of time so I decided to withdraw this paper for the moment.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a crucial mistake in proof of lemma 4.2.

The paper is withdrawn due to some errors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in conclusion .

This paper has been withdrawn. It will be split into two separate papers. New results will be added in both papers.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to crucial error in the main proof (located in Section 2.4). The authors apologize for any inconveniences.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. We have discovered an error in the evaluation of the diagram, which invalidates our conclusion.