Related papers: The Teichm\"uller group is good

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to numerical problems to get viable results.

This paper has been withdrawn because the models on which it was based have undergone significant changes and improvements. A new paper with the same title, based on the improved models, is accepted for publication in MNRAS and is available…

This article has been replaced by arXiv:0807.3093

The paper is withdrawn due to mistakes in the proofs for Proposition 1.2 and Theorem 2.2.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a gap in the proof of the main result (in 5.3).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in Proposition 2.2.

The paper is withdrawn.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

This paper has been withdrawn. The authors realized that the obtained results were not new.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to a crucial error in equation 12.

This paper has been superseded by math.AG/0510287 and withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to imprecisions which must conduce to wrong results.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to a mistake pointed out by Lenny Ng and Josh Sabloff.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due a critical mistake on page 3.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to extremely unscientific errors.

This paper was withdrawn by arXiv administrators. It is an erroneous duplicate submission of math.NA/0405095.

The author was informed that the result in the original version had been obtained earlier by K. Ueda (arXiv:math/0503355 [math.AG]). The paper is retracted.

The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in Lemma 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.