Related papers: Computability Superselection Rule and its physical…

Although the results are correct, it was pointed out that the results follow from some previously known results. Accordingly, this version of the paper is withdrawn by the authors.

The paper is withdrawn by the author due to an oversimplified and misleading approach which was taken initially as a starting point.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to unhappy mistake in the initial scope of the work.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, because a profoundly overhauled and improved version, also with a new title and two more authors, has now been submitted to the arXiv, with no. hep-ph/0310059. In view of the elapsed time and the…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to serious flaws in certain proofs. For instance, the method used to construct certain automorphic representations is flawed.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a the manuscript error.

This letter introduces a new, substantially simplified version of the branching recurrence operation of computability logic (see http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~giorgi/cl.html), and proves its equivalence to the old, "canonical" version.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proof of Theorem 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because there are some typos in proofs.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due to a crucial error in eq. 6.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author. There is an error on page 3 in the last inequality before Lemma 1.1.

Paper is withdrawn. On review the paper contributes little of significance. The runtime analysis of the algorithms presented, while correct in terms of number of operations, does not represent the complexity of the algorithms in terms of…

Withdrawn by the authors due to crucial errors in equations (1) and (2).

The paper has been withdrawn due to an error in Lemma 1.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, because of serious experimental problems.

The paper is being withdrawn. A new submission will follow.

Withdrawn due to error. See D. Lowe, L. Susskind and J. Uglum, hep-th/9402136, for correct treatment. Apologies to all recipients.

This paper has been withdrawn due a crucial mistake due to a crucial mistake in the proof of Lemma 2.3.