Related papers: Computability Superselection Rule and its physical…

This paper has been withdrawn, as it is obsolete and incorrect. It has been superceded by arXiv:1204.0484

Withdrawn because of non-correctness. Would have implied too much to be true :-|

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to rewritting and skipping crucial sign errors.

Paper withdrawn due to conceptual mistakes. A corrected version will soon be available at the gr-qc archive.

This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial theoretical error.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial definition error of Triebel space.

The paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to it being fundamentally flawed. The author apologizes for any inconvenience it may have caused.

There are several serious errors in this paper. I thought to have time to fix it, but it did not occur for years. So I withdraw this paper.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because the conclusions reached in it are incorrect.

This paper has been withdrawn due to crucial erros in equations (24)--(31).

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a error in attachment of source file.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due to double submission. You can find it under: physics/0208019

%auto-ignore This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s) because somebody do not agree with my idea.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake.

This paper is withdrawn because of an error in Lemma 3.1

The paper was retracted.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the submission action.

This paper had been withdrawn because the prime reported effect had not been confirmed in further investigations (see arXiv:0812.4488 [hep-lat]).

This paper has been retracted, for obvious reasons.

The paper was withdrawn due to another possible solution to the dataset that is significantly different in nature. This issue will be addressed shortly and clarified with an additional data point.