Related papers: Reply to the Comment 'On large-N expansion'
Marchildon's arguments against my earlier work are refuted.
The validity of non-perturbative methods is questioned. The concept of relative space is introduced.
Comment on Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]
Comment on Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]
We show that the key formula in the works [Ding, Zhu, and Berakdar, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 79}, 045405 (2009); {\bf 84}, 115433 (2011); Ding, Zhu, Zhang, and Berakdar, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 82}, 155143 (2010)] is invalid in the extended graphene…
An indeterministic interpretation of classical physics has been proposed recently, in which the argument relies on attacking an alleged unwarranted metaphysical hidden assumption of the standard deterministic interpretation. This short…
The semi-relativistic equation is cast into a second-order Schrodinger-like equation with the inclusion of relativistic corrections up to order (v/c)^2. The resulting equation is solved via the shifted-l expansion technique, which has been…
We speculate on a possible interpretation of events selected by the SELEX collaboration and stress an insufficient evidence for the observation of doubly charmed baryon.
We reply to Creutz's comments on our paper " 't Hooft vertices, partial quenching, and rooted staggered QCD." We show that his criticisms are incorrect and result from a misunderstanding both of our work, and of the related work of Adams.
In their correspondence [arXiv:1610.07633] Drummond and Brand criticize our work [Nature Physics 12, 451-454 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys3631]. We show that their criticism is misleading and unfounded.
Few days ago V.D. Efros submitted a preprint to nucl-th containing criticisms of our recent research activity on bound and scattering states of A=3, 4 nucleons. As a consequence, we are forced to examine the essence of the controversy and…
This correspondence disproves the main results in the paper "Design of Asymmetric Shift Operators for Efficient Decentralized Subspace Projection" by S. Mollaebrahim and B. Beferull-Lozano. Counterexamples and counterproofs are provided…
A Reply to the criticisms contained in astro-ph/9612003 is provided and a logical inconsistency in astro-ph/9612214 is pointed out.
The purpose of this comment is to present the perturbation approach proposed by Maiz J. Math. Phys. 60, 012103 (2019) in a clearer way. The results of our straightforward procedure agree with those obtained by that author except for one…
We analyse the Bell paradox from the point of view of an inertial referential frame and from the one of an accelerated frame. We calculate the distance between the two accelerated spaceships as it appears in each referential and we show…
In the Letter 'Comment on 'Affine density, von Neumann dimension and a problem of Perelomov', arXiv.2211.04879, by Prof. J. L. Romero, it is claimed that the main theorem of Ref2 := [Adv. Math. 407, Article ID 108564, 22 p. (2022)] is…
Yuan and Feng [Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138:70, 2023] recently proposed a modification of the nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:240402, 2013] and argued that photons give "contradictory"…
Some misleading statements in a recent paper in PRE are corrected.
I give a brief overview of the model-independent analysis of unstable baryon resonances in the 1/N_c QCD expansion. This approach produces numerous surprising semi-quantitative phenomenological predictions that are supported by available…
I now agree with conclusion of author that there is a problem with unitarity in discussed models.